Surprisingly, I was impressed with how well the play follwed the book! Though I haven't finished the book and have not been able to compare all aspects, both were aligned almost exactly!
Believe it or not, I think the book has been more interesting than the play, because while reading the book I had no idea what would happen next, but in the play I knew what would happen so it made some parts semi-boring. Who liked the play better? Or who has liked the book Better? And why?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow! I liked them both the same I guess. I am a visual learner, so actually seeing the play helped me to better understand the book. However, I like how the book goes into more details than the play. Also, beleive it or not, I like reading books written in older language. (Romeo and Juliet is my favorite... call me crazy... haha).
ReplyDeleteI can't decide which one... They were both excellent!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like both equally. Actually seeing the play put all the places and characters together and I could tell who was who very easily. Great blog!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed both the play and the novel. I agree with you about knowing what was going to happen in the play and I too was a little bored because of it.
ReplyDelete